<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Oliver Forum</title>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Please do confirm (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>316Ti is similar to 316L except that 316Ti has better high temperature strength, and mechanical strength. Used for equipment exposed to aggressive corrosive conditions and high temperature applications.</p>
<p>Under most conditions it can be taken that the two grades are interchangeable, 316L (316S11/1.4404) being suitable for applications where 316Ti (320S31/1.4571) is specified. In aqueous corrosion media or environments at ambient temperatures, there is no practical advantage in specifying the 316Ti type in preference to the 316L. In some circumstances the 316L (1.4404 / 1.4432) grades may be better choices.</p>
<p>Hope this is of some assistance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=51</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=51</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:21:28 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>cburroughs</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Please do confirm</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color:#009;">I have quoted the SS 316L material for manifolds, while customer is asking for SS 316Ti, could you please clarify, what is basic difference between them?</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=50</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=50</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:39:40 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>raees@ueccontrol.com</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSS-SP-105 Conformance (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver Valves Ltd can manufacture instrument valves in accordance with the requirements of MSS-SP-105.</p>
<p>If you have any other questions, feel free to post them here on the forum, or by emailing <a href="mailto:sales@valves.co.uk">sales@valves.co.uk</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=49</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=49</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:00:14 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PE_Shillito</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSS-SP-105 Conformance</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please verify that Oliver valves are in conformance with MSS-SP-105</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=48</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=48</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:28:13 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>tayfos</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Please do confirm (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes 316L is available and I can confirm that all Oliver Valves 316 Stainless Steel is DUEL CERTIFIED to both 316/316L.</p>
<p>If you request 316L in your enquiry, we can make sure that this is the material quoted.</p>
<p>If you have any other questions please do not hesitate to post here or contact us at sales@valves.co.uk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=47</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=47</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:39:45 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>cburroughs</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Please do confirm</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have quoted Y34S model in a project. But client is asking to change the manifold material as S=316L Stainless steel. But i didn't found it in the manual. Please do confirm, is it available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=46</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=46</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:56:29 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>raees@ueccontrol.com</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Minimum working tempearture of Y34S 3 valve manifold (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Y34S needle valve manifold is suitable for a minimum working temperature of -50degC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=44</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=44</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:28:18 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>P_Shillito</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Minimum working tempearture of Y34S 3 valve manifold</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are sole representaive of Yokogawa in pakistan. We have offered oliver 3 valve model # Y34S, client have a question that what is the minimum temperature range. Can it work on -40 dec C? please do confirm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=43</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=43</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:55:53 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>raees@ueccontrol.com</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>316Ti stainless steel (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No we don't. We have occasionally seen requirements for this material, more often than not from Germany, but it is not widely available in the UK. The Ti means that a small amount of titanium has been added to the material to improve its mechanical strength at high temperatures (greater than 600C) and resistance to intergranular corrosion after exposure to high temperatures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=42</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=42</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:13:53 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PE_Shillito</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>316Ti stainless steel</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you manufacture your needle valve manifolds from 316Ti stainless steel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=41</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=41</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:24:19 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kafuka</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pressure Equipment Directive (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the valves produced by Oliver ValveTek are used on christmas trees and piping manifolds. These are excluded from the Pressure Equipment Directive (D.T.I. Guidance Notes on the UK Regulations, April 2005 Annex A).</p>
<p>Also, you're right in that we do get asked that fairly often. Thanks for asking though. Any more questions, feel free to post again on here or contact us by any of the means on <a href="http://www.valves.co.uk/contactus.php">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=40</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=40</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 14:39:26 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PE_Shillito</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pressure Equipment Directive</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be asked this fairly often, but I'd still like to know:</p>
<p>Are the subsea valves produced by Oliver ValveTek in compliance with the Pressure Equipment Directive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=39</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=39</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 13:46:08 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MelisaP</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Subsea Water Depth (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your question Marcel.</p>
<p>Currently, our actuators are design and qualification tested to 10,000FT at 3,050M. This is limited by our current hyperbaric test chamber capacity. However there is no reason why we cannot develop a deeper water chamber!</p>
<p>I hope this answers your question. Any more questions, feel free to post again on here or contact us by any of the means on <a href="http://www.valves.co.uk/contactus.php">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=38</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=38</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 17:02:39 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PE_Shillito</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Subsea Water Depth</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there. A little question to the guys at valvetek: What is the maximum water depth that your actuated subsea gate valves are qualified for?</p>
<p>Tahnks in advance,</p>
<p>Marcel Pundit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=37</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=37</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 15:03:57 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MarcelPundit</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>5 Valve Manifolds (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5 valve manifolds are primarily used when dealing with hazardous chemicals and hydrocarbons. The additional valves are then used for safe venting and/or calibration.</p>
<p>Thanks for your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=35</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=35</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:00:58 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PE_Shillito</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>5 Valve Manifolds</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the uses of 3 valve manifolds, but what application would warrant the use of a 5-valve manifold? I'm a little confused as to what the additional 2 valves would be used for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=34</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=34</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:39:25 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>JimmyJimmy</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>What is a TDU? (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TDU stands for Tool Deployment Unit. It bolts onto the ROV and holds tools for operating the valves.</p>
<p>There are 2 types of TDU commonly used subsea, a single or a double point docking system. Once the ROV has docked, it deploys a tool to operate the valves.  These tools are governed by standards such as ISO 13628-8.</p>
<p>Thanks for your question.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=33</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=33</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:13:02 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PE_Shillito</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>A quick question about PR2 tests (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your thoughts are correct. When testing a bi-directional valve, during towards the end of the PR2 test, the valve is required to be tested in the reverse direction at low pressure.</p>
<p>Thanks for your question.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=32</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=32</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:24:17 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PE_Shillito</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>A quick question about PR2 tests</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've always read about PR2 tests as being strictly a single-direction test. Is this true? I would have thought there should be some testing in the opposite direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=31</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=31</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:15:42 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>KaylaFindlay</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>What is a TDU?</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some of your specifications, it states &quot;ROV operated valves with TDU&quot;. I'm not sure what a TDU actually is. Can you help?</p>
<p>Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=30</link>
<guid>http://www.valves.co.uk/forum/index.php?id=30</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:09:17 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TheSoares</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>